Koss FitClips KSC32i (2015) vs Audeze iSine 10 In-Ear Headphones (2016)

The Koss FitClips KSC32i (2015) and Audeze iSine 10 In-Ear Headphones (2016) make for good, if unremarkable, Canal Earphones at their respective budgets.

With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $11 and $340 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.

If you want to learn more about the Koss FitClips KSC32i (2015) and the Audeze iSine 10 In-Ear Headphones (2016), however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:

Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the Koss FitClips KSC32i (2015) to be a great product - it earned the "Also great" title from Wirecutter (NYTimes) and "The best cheap running headphones value" from Tom's Guide in their respective Canal Earphone roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.

As for the Audeze iSine 10 In-Ear Headphones (2016), it was really well-received by reviewers at SoundGuys, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "Best Lightning headphones of 2020" roundup and was named its "Best sound", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

We also wanted to do a direct Koss FitClips KSC32i (2015) vs. Audeze iSine 10 In-Ear Headphones (2016) review performance comparison, but we, unfortunately, weren't able to find any Koss FitClips KSC32i (2015) review scores.

Finally, we compared the Audeze iSine 10 In-Ear Headphones (2016) to other Canal Earphones on the market and found that it did much better than its competitors - its review average of 8.6 out of 10 points is considerably higher than the 7.4 review average of Canal Earphones in general.