Aukey EP-N5 vs KZ ZS3

The Aukey EP-N5 makes for a good, if unremarkable, Earphone for people with a $85 budget.

The KZ ZS3, however, is merely mediocre at its $13 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $85 and $10 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Aukey EP-N5 and KZ ZS3, however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:

The Aukey EP-N5 was loved by reviewers at Android Central, a trustworthy source that performs objective hands-on testing. It did great in their "Best Wireless Earbuds 2021" roundup - in fact, they named it their "Best Cheap AirPods Alternative". That, by itself, points toward it being a noteworthy Earphone.

As for the KZ ZS3 - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its KZ-ZS3 Hifi High-End 3.5mm In-Ear Earphone Headphones Earpiece Original Headset Bass Earbuds With Microphone review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Aukey EP-N5 got its highest, 8, rating from Macworld, while the KZ ZS3 earned its best, 9, score from Head-fi.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Aukey EP-N5 and KZ ZS3 managed averages of 8.0 and 9.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Aukey EP-N5 vs. KZ ZS3 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.