Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Bowers & Wilkins C5 Series 2 (2014) vs KZ ZS3
Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014)
The Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) makes for a good, if unremarkable, Canal Earphone for people with a $100 budget.
The KZ ZS3, however, is merely mediocre at its $13 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $100 and $10 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) and KZ ZS3, however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
The Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Wired Headphones for 2020" roundup where it was named its "Best for Design Fans", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the KZ ZS3 - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its KZ-ZS3 Hifi High-End 3.5mm In-Ear Earphone Headphones Earpiece Original Headset Bass Earbuds With Microphone review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like Head-fi, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.
Then we checked which sources liked these two Canal Earphones best and found that the Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) got its highest, 9, review score from reviewers at PCmag, whereas the KZ ZS3 earned its best score of 9 from Head-fi.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Canal Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Canal Earphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) and KZ ZS3 managed averages of 8.7 and 9.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Bowers and WIlkins C5 Series 2 (2014) vs. KZ ZS3 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.