Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Jaybird Freedom 2 (2017) vs KZ ZS3
Jaybird Freedom 2 (2017)
While the Jaybird Freedom 2 (2017) makes for a passable Canal Earphone for its asking price, the KZ ZS3 simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by the majority of people. In either case, we suggest that you look into some better alternatives that cost around $40 or $16.
However, if you'd nonetheless like to find out more about the Jaybird Freedom 2 (2017) and the KZ ZS3, you can continue reading for our summary of what we know about them:
The Jaybird Freedom 2 (2017) hasn't managed to earn a top spot in any roundups from sources that conduct trustworthy hands-on testing. Nevertheless, reviewers from sites, such as SoundGuys, PCmag, Rtings, and Headphone Review all gave it a spot on their list.
As for the KZ ZS3 - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its KZ-ZS3 Hifi High-End 3.5mm In-Ear Earphone Headphones Earpiece Original Headset Bass Earbuds With Microphone review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Canal Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Jaybird Freedom 2 (2017) got its highest, 8.9, rating from Technically Well, while the KZ ZS3 earned its best, 9, score from Head-fi.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Canal Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Canal Earphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Jaybird Freedom 2 (2017) and KZ ZS3 managed averages of 7.7 and 9.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Jaybird Freedom 2 (2017) vs. KZ ZS3 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.