Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Phiaton BT120 NC vs KZ ZS3
The Phiaton BT120 NC and KZ ZS3 make for good, if unremarkable, Canal Earphones at their respective budgets.
With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $80 and $10 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.
If you want to learn more about the Phiaton BT120 NC and the KZ ZS3, however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:
The Phiaton BT120 NC hasn't managed to earn a top spot in any roundups from sources that conduct trustworthy hands-on testing. Nevertheless, reviewers from sites, such as Headphone Review, Android Central, and Reviewed all gave it a spot on their list.
As for the KZ ZS3 - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its KZ-ZS3 Hifi High-End 3.5mm In-Ear Earphone Headphones Earpiece Original Headset Bass Earbuds With Microphone review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Canal Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Phiaton BT120 NC got its highest, 8, rating from TechHive, while the KZ ZS3 earned its best, 9, score from Head-fi.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Canal Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Canal Earphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Phiaton BT120 NC and KZ ZS3 managed averages of 7.5 and 9.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Phiaton BT120 NC vs. KZ ZS3 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.