Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
KZ ZS3 vs TaoTronics TT-BH053
The KZ ZS3 makes for a good, if unremarkable, Canal Earphone for people with a $9 budget.
The TaoTronics TT-BH053, however, is merely mediocre at its $44 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $9 and $40 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the KZ ZS3 and TaoTronics TT-BH053, however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the KZ ZS3 in their KZ-ZS3 Hifi High-End 3.5mm In-Ear Earphone Headphones Earpiece Original Headset Bass Earbuds With Microphone review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the TaoTronics TT-BH053 - CNET, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its TaoTronics TWS TT-BH053 review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Canal Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the KZ ZS3 got its highest, 9, rating from Head-fi, while the TaoTronics TT-BH053 earned its best, 7.9, score from CNET.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Canal Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Canal Earphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the KZ ZS3 and TaoTronics TT-BH053 managed averages of 9.0 and 7.9 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct KZ ZS3 vs. TaoTronics TT-BH053 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.