Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP vs LG 34WK95U 34"
The Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP and LG 34WK95U 34" make for good, if unremarkable, Monitors at their respective budgets.
With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $450 and $1,400 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.
If you want to learn more about the Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP and the LG 34WK95U 34", however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:
The Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Portable Monitors for 2021" roundup where it was named its "Best for Off-the-Power-Cord Users", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Taking a look at the LG 34WK95U 34", it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - PCGamesN and Rtings - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP got its highest, 9, rating from Windows Central, while the LG 34WK95U 34" earned its best, 8.9, score from Gadget Review.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP and LG 34WK95U 34" managed averages of 8.5 and 8.2 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP vs. LG 34WK95U 34" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing