Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
LG E8 OLED vs Samsung RU7300
The Samsung RU7300 65" and the LG E8 OLED 65" are decent TVs at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $700 or $1,700.
If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the Samsung RU7300 65" and the LG E8 OLED 65", however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:
The reviewers at Rtings have featured the Samsung RU7300 65" in their Samsung RU7300 TV Review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the LG E8 OLED 65", it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Techradar, Rtings, TrustedReviews, and Reviewed enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like Rtings, and learned that they all showed a preference for the LG E8 OLED 65".
Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two TVs received. We found that the Samsung RU7300 65" managed to earn a rating of 9.4 from Gadget Review, whereas the LG E8 OLED 65" got its highest, 10, score from reviewers at Techradar.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other TVs on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by TVs being 7.7 out of 10, whereas the Samsung RU7300 65" and LG E8 OLED 65" managed averages of 8.1 and 8.9 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Samsung RU7300 65" vs. LG E8 OLED 65" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.