Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
LG GL600 series monitors (2019) vs Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ 2018
The LG 24GL600F 24" and Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ make for very strong choices and are great Monitors for their respective $140 and $2700 asking prices. Depending on how much you're willing to spend, either of these options will serve you well.
The LG 24GL600F 24" was loved by reviewers at Rtings, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The 5 Best 120Hz Monitors - Winter 2023" roundup where it was named its "Best Cheap 120Hz Monitor", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Taking a look at the Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ, we found it was well-received by reviewers from a couple of reliable sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, including PC Gamer, Techradar, and Android Authority. It performed great in their Monitor roundups - it managed to earn the "The best premium-price 4K monitor" title from PC Gamer, "Ranked 2 out of 6" from Techradar, and "Ranked 2 out of 5" from Android Authority, which is a notable accomplishment.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the LG 24GL600F 24" got its highest, 9.4, rating from MonitorNerds, while the Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ earned its best, 9, score from TrustedReviews.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the LG 24GL600F 24" and Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ managed averages of 7.9 and 8.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct LG 24GL600F 24" vs. Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing