Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Acer Predator XB series 4K monitors (2016) vs LG GL650 series monitors (2019)
The Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz and the LG 27GL650F 27" are decent Monitors at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $2,300 or $310.
If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz and the LG 27GL650F 27", however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:
PC Gamer, a source known for its hands-on testing and objective methodology, had good things to say about the Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz. It performed great in its "The best G-Sync monitors for 2021" roundup and earned the "Best G-Sync monitor for high-end graphics setups." title.
As for the LG 27GL650F 27" - Rtings, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its LG 27GL650F-B Monitor Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz got its highest, 9.6, rating from Gadget Review, while the LG 27GL650F 27" earned its best, 7.7, score from Rtings.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz and LG 27GL650F 27" managed averages of 8.5 and 7.7 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Acer Predator XB321HK bmiphz vs. LG 27GL650F 27" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing