Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
ViewSonic XG270QG (2019) vs LG GL650 series monitors (2019)
The ViewSonic XG270QG 27" is a great Monitor for its $586 asking price.
The LG 27GL650F 27", however, while a reasonable product for $299, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Monitors in the $310 range, you might want to check out some better options.
Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the ViewSonic XG270QG 27" to be a great product - it earned the "Best 1440p G-SYNC Gaming Monitor" title from Rtings and "Best for Multiplayer High-Refresh Gaming at 1440p" from PCmag in their respective Monitor roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.
As for the LG 27GL650F 27" - Rtings, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its LG 27GL650F-B Monitor Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Monitors, including Rtings, preferred the ViewSonic XG270QG 27" over the LG 27GL650F 27".
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The ViewSonic XG270QG 27" was liked best by PCmag, which gave it a score of 9, while the LG 27GL650F 27" got its highest, 7.7, score from Rtings.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the ViewSonic XG270QG 27" and LG 27GL650F 27" managed averages of 8.3 and 7.7 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct ViewSonic XG270QG 27" vs. LG 27GL650F 27" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing