Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
LG GL850 series monitors 2019 vs Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP
The LG 27GL850-B 27" is an example of a great Monitor at its $400 budget.
In the case of the $489 Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP, however, we weren't able to find enough data to come to any reliable conclusions. If you're considering buying a Monitor in the $530 range, we encourage you to take a look at some other options.
The LG 27GL850-B 27" managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and unbiased sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, namely Windows Central and TechSpot. It performed great in their roundups - it earned the "Ranked 1 out of 2" title from Windows Central and "Ranked 1 out of 5" from TechSpot, which makes it a product worthy of consideration.
As for the Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP analysis - it impressed reviewers at creativebloq.com, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "The best portable monitors in 2023" roundup and earned the "The best portable monitor with built-in battery" title.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the LG 27GL850-B 27" got its highest, 9.6, rating from MonitorNerds, while the Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP earned its best, 9, score from Windows Central.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the LG 27GL850-B 27" and Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP managed averages of 8.9 and 8.5 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct LG 27GL850-B 27" vs. Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing