Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
LG GL850 series monitors 2019 vs Samsung CJ791 series monitors 2018
The LG 27GL850-B 27" and Samsung C34J791 34" make for very strong choices and are great Monitors for their respective $349 and $572 asking prices. Depending on how much you're willing to spend, either of these options will serve you well.
The LG 27GL850-B 27" managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and unbiased sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, namely Windows Central and TechSpot. It performed great in their roundups - it earned the "Ranked 1 out of 2" title from Windows Central and "Ranked 1 out of 5" from TechSpot, which makes it a product worthy of consideration.
As for our analysis of the Samsung C34J791 34" - it has done great in a number of roundups done by unbiased sources that conduct their own testing, like iMore, Popular Mechanics, and Eurogamer - it was named "Best for Mac" by iMore, "Most Immersive" by Popular Mechanics, and "Best ultra-wide FreeSync monitor" by Eurogamer.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Monitors, including MonitorNerds and Rtings, preferred the LG 27GL850-B 27" over the Samsung C34J791 34".
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The LG 27GL850-B 27" was liked best by MonitorNerds, which gave it a score of 9.6, while the Samsung C34J791 34" got its highest, 9.4, score from MonitorNerds.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the LG 27GL850-B 27" and Samsung C34J791 34" managed averages of 8.9 and 8.2 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct LG 27GL850-B 27" vs. Samsung C34J791 34" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing