Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Samsung Q60T (2020) vs LG NANO90 series TVs (2020)
The Samsung Q60T 43" is a great TV for its $589 asking price.
The LG NANO90 65", however, while a reasonable product for $1196, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering TVs in the $1,100 range, you might want to check out some better options.
The Samsung Q60T 43" has managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and objective sources that conduct their own testing, namely Android Central, Rtings, and Digital Camera World. It did great in their roundups - it earned the "Great value" title from Android Central, and "Best 43 Inch TV" from Rtings, which marks it as a product that's worth considering.
Returning to the LG NANO90 65", Rtings, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Runner Up for Best 65 Inch TV Under $1,500 - Wide Angle Alternative" in its "The 6 Best 4k TVs Under $1,500 - Winter 2021" roundup, which is quite a feat.
We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like Techradar and Rtings, and learned that they all showed a preference for the LG NANO90 65".
Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two TVs received. We found that the Samsung Q60T 43" managed to earn a rating of 7.3 from Rtings, whereas the LG NANO90 65" got its highest, 8, score from reviewers at Pocket-lint.
Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The LG NANO90 65" managed to get 7.8 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.7 review average of TVs in general - whereas the Samsung Q60T 43" earned 6.8 points.
It should be said that doing a direct Samsung Q60T 43" vs. LG NANO90 65" comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing