Logitech K800 (2010) vs Arteck HB030B

The Logitech K800 (2010) and Arteck HB030B make for good, if unremarkable, Wireless Keyboards at their respective budgets.

With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $60 and $30 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.

If you want to learn more about the Logitech K800 (2010) and the Arteck HB030B, however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:

The Logitech K800 (2010) has done great in various roundups conducted by reliable and unbiased sources that do their own testing, like PCWorld, Windows Central, TechSpot, and Tom's Guide - it earned the "Best overall wireless desktop keyboard " title from PCWorld, "Best Wireless for Windows" from Windows Central, and "Best Wireless Keyboard" from TechSpot.

As for the Arteck HB030B - it impressed reviewers at Windows Central, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "Best Tablet Keyboards in 2021" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Best Budget" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Wireless Keyboards, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Logitech K800 (2010) got its highest, 7.7, rating from CNET, while the Arteck HB030B earned its best, 7.7, score from Gadget Review.

Lastly, we averaged out all of their review ratings and observed that the Logitech K800 (2010), with its 7.7 average, performed considerably better than most Wireless Keyboards - the mean score for the product category being 7.1 out of 10 - while the Arteck HB030B managed an average of 6.8.

There's one caveat here - it might not be entirely justifiable to do a direct Logitech K800 (2010) vs. Arteck HB030B review average comparison since they aren't priced the same and more expensive products tend to get higher review scores from some sources.