Marshall Mid ANC vs Master & Dynamic MW65

The Marshall Mid BT ANC makes for a good, if unremarkable Wireless Headphone for people with a $330 budget. The Master & Dynamic MW65, however, is merely mediocre when compared to other options at its price point and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In both cases, however, you might want to look into some alternatives at the $330 price range - chances are that there are better options available.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Marshall Mid BT ANC and Master & Dynamic MW65, however, we put together a summary of what we know:

Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the Marshall Mid BT ANC to be a great product - it earned the "Runner Up for Best On-Ear Wireless Headphones - More Comfortable Alternative" title from Rtings and "Ranked 3 out of 10" from PCmag in their respective Wireless Headphone roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.

Returning to the Master & Dynamic MW65, PCmag, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "A High-End Alternative to the AirPods Max" in its "The Best Noise-Cancelling Headphones for 2021" roundup, which is quite a feat.

Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Marshall Mid BT ANC earned an average review score of 7.9 out of 10 points and the Master & Dynamic MW65 received an average of 8.0, compared to the 7.3 average of Wireless Headphones in general.