Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Microsoft Surface Precision Mouse (2017) vs HP Omen Photon (2019)
Microsoft Surface Precision Mouse (2017)

The Microsoft Surface Precision Mouse (2017) has done really well in a number of roundups conducted by sources that perform reliable hands-on testing, like Expert Reviews, techadvisor.com, Popular Mechanics, and Windows Central - it ended up getting the "The best mouse for premium feel" title from Expert Reviews, "Best for Windows users" from techadvisor.com, and "Most Versatile" from Popular Mechanics. That's high praise coming from reliable sources.
Moving on to the HP Omen Photon (2019): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like PCmag, Windows Central, The Outerheaven, TrustedReviews, Rtings, Tom's Guide, and Laptop Mag, enough for them to include them on those lists.
As for a direct Microsoft Surface Precision Mouse (2017) vs. HP Omen Photon (2019) comparison of their review performance, we examined sources that tested and rated both products, like PCmag and Laptop Mag. It turns out that all such sources consider the HP Omen Photon (2019) to be the superior product.
We also looked at the available data to find which sources liked each of them best and learned that the Microsoft Surface Precision Mouse (2017) most impressed reviewers at PCWorld - they gave it a score of 7, whereas the HP Omen Photon (2019) got rated best by PCmag - 8.
Finally, we compared them to other Gaming Mice and found that the HP Omen Photon (2019), on average, got reviewed considerably better than most of its competitors - it earned a review average of 7.6 points, compared to the 7.5 out of 10 overall rating of Gaming Mice in general, whereas the Microsoft Surface Precision Mouse (2017) performed worse than the majority of its competitors, with an average of only 6.3.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing