Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (2019) vs Acer Predator Triton 500 (2019)
The Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (2019) - i5, 8 GB RAM, 128 GB was loved by reviewers at CNET, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best Windows Laptop for 2023" roundup where it was named its "Best Surface laptop", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Returning to the Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-75L8 (2019), it managed to impress reviewers from some of the internet's most highly trusted sources, Tom's Guide and AnandTech. It performed great in their hands-on roundups - it was named "The best 15-inch gaming laptop for ultra-fast refresh rates" by Tom's Guide and "Ranked 1 out of 2" by AnandTech. That's quite an achievement, especially coming from such high-quality sources.
For a direct Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (2019) - i5, 8 GB RAM, 128 GB vs. Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-75L8 (2019) comparison, we took a look at sources that tested both and found that the Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (2019) - i5, 8 GB RAM, 128 GB got reviewed better by CNET, whereas the reviewers at T3, PCWorld, hardwarezone.com.sg, Techradar, Digitaltrends, and Tom's Guide preferred the Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-75L8 (2019). Reviewers at PCmag and Laptop Mag haven't shown a preference for either.
We also took a look at which sources liked these two products the most. We found that the Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (2019) - i5, 8 GB RAM, 128 GB received its best, 10, rating from mynexttablet.com, while the Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-75L8 (2019) got its highest score of 10 from T3.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (2019) - i5, 8 GB RAM, 128 GB earned an average review score of 7.9 out of 10 points and the Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-75L8 (2019) received an average of 8.3, compared to the 7.6 average of Traditional Laptops in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing