Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Monoprice 108320 Enhanced Bass (2012) vs AfterShokz Trekz (2015)
AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015)

headphonesaddict.com, a source known for its hands-on testing and objective methodology, had good things to say about the Monoprice 108320 Enhanced Bass (2012). It performed great in its "8 Best Earbuds under $10 in 2023 (Kings of Budget)" roundup and earned the "Ranked 2 out of 8" title.
As for our analysis of the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) - it has done great in a number of roundups done by unbiased sources that conduct their own testing, like Popular Mechanics, MakeUseOf, and Android Central - it was named "Ranked 2 out of 8" by Popular Mechanics, "Ranked 2 out of 7" by MakeUseOf, and "Ranked 3 out of 6" by Android Central.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these In-Ear Monitors, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Monoprice 108320 Enhanced Bass (2012) got its highest, 7.7, rating from Head-fi, while the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) earned its best, 7, score from Techradar.
Lastly, we compared their average review performance to that of the rest of their competition and found that neither option got received particularly well. With an average rating of 7.7 out of 10, the Monoprice 108320 Enhanced Bass (2012) performed similarly to most other In-Ear Monitors on the market - the overall average review score for this product category being 7.7 - while the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) did worse than most, with its average of 6.3 points.
There's one caveat here - a direct Monoprice 108320 Enhanced Bass (2012) vs. AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) comparison might not be entirely justifiable due to the difference in their pricing and the fact that some sources tend to give lower ratings to cheaper products because they don't take value for money into account.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing