Apple AirPods (2019) vs Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A

The Apple AirPods (2019) is a great Earphone for its $128 asking price.

The Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A, however, while a reasonable product for $21, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Earphones in the $15 range, you might want to check out some better options.

The Apple AirPods (2019) got praised by CNET and Rtings - two highly trusted sources that perform in-depth hands-on testing. It was awarded the "Most compact -- and top-notch for calls" title from CNET and "Most Comfortable Apple Headphones" from Rtings in their respective Earphone roundups.

Returning to the Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A, SoundGuys, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "best bang for your buck" in its "Best waterproof headphones" roundup, which is quite a feat.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Earphones, including Lifewire, preferred the Apple AirPods (2019) over the Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A.

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Apple AirPods (2019) was liked best by Lifewire, which gave it a score of 9.6, while the Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A got its highest, 8, score from Lifewire.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Apple AirPods (2019) and Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A managed averages of 7.7 and 8.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Apple AirPods (2019) vs. Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.