Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
MSI Optix G27C4 vs Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP
The MSI Optix G27C4 27" makes for a good, if unremarkable Monitor for people with a $320 budget. The Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP, however, is merely mediocre when compared to other options at its price point and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In both cases, however, you might want to look into some alternatives at the $320 price range - chances are that there are better options available.
If you're still interested in learning more about the MSI Optix G27C4 27" and Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP, however, we put together a summary of what we know:
The MSI Optix G27C4 27" was loved by reviewers at Rtings, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The 6 Best Gaming Monitors Under $300 - Winter 2021" roundup where it was named its "Runner Up for Best 27 Inch Gaming Monitor Under $300 - Dark Room Alternative", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP, it was really well-received by reviewers at PCmag, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The Best Portable Monitors for 2021" roundup and was named its "Best for Off-the-Power-Cord Users", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.
We tried doing a direct MSI Optix G27C4 27" vs. Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP review score comparison but couldn't find any sources that tested both.
Next, we took a look at which sources liked them best and found that the MSI Optix G27C4 27" most impressed the reviewers at MonitorNerds, who gave it a score of 9.6, whereas the Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP did best in its Windows Central review - it scored 9 points.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the MSI Optix G27C4 27" earned an average review score of 8.1 out of 10 points and the Asus ZenScreen Go MB16AP received an average of 8.5, compared to the 7.3 average of Monitors in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing