Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO vs Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3

The Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO and Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3 make for good, if unremarkable, CPU Coolers at their respective budgets.

With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $40 and $95 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.

If you want to learn more about the Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO and the Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3, however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:

The Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and unbiased sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, namely Windows Central and PCGamesN. It performed great in their roundups - it earned the "Best Value" title from Windows Central and "best budget CPU cooler" from PCGamesN, which makes it a product worthy of consideration.

As for the Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3 analysis - it impressed reviewers at Windows Central, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best CPU Coolers for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in 2021" roundup and earned the "Best Air Cooler" title.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these CPU Coolers, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO got its highest, 8.4, rating from GamingScan, while the Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3 earned its best, 9, score from Tom's Hardware.