Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Nokia 3.1 (2018/2019) vs Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019)
We couldn't find enough data on either product to be able to come to any reliable conclusions. We highly recommend that you take a look at some other options instead.
While the Nokia 3.1 (2018) wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Notebookcheck.net, Android Central, Techradar, slashgear.com, PCmag, and GSMArena have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.
Returning to the Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019), Digital Camera World, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Ranked 3 out of 12" in its "Best flip phones & best fold phones in 2021" roundup, which is quite a feat.
We analyzed all of the review data that we could find on these two Smartphones. First, we examined sources that tested and scored both of these products - Android Central, Notebookcheck.net, and Digitaltrends favored the Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019) over the Nokia 3.1 (2018), whereas reviewers at Techradar and PCmag haven't shown a preference for either.
Then we took a look at which sources liked them the most - we found that the Nokia 3.1 (2018) was best received by Notebookcheck.net - it gave it a score of 8.1, whereas the Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019) got its highest score of 9 from reviewers at Android Central.
Finally, we analyzed all of their review data and compared their averages to other options on the market. With an average review rating of 6.6 out of 10 points, the Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019) performed similarly to most of its competitors - the overall average review score for Smartphones being 7.5 - whereas the Nokia 3.1 (2018) performed worse than most, with its 6.2 average.
It's worth keeping in mind that a direct Nokia 3.1 (2018) vs. Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019) comparison might not be entirely fair because some sources tend to ignore value for money when assigning their scores and thus often give better reviews to more expensive products.