Nikon Z 6 Cameras (2018) vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Cameras (2017)

The Nikon Z 6 (2018) managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and unbiased sources that conduct their own hands-on testing, namely shotkit.com and Gear Patrol. It performed great in their roundups - it earned the "BEST BUDGET FULL FRAME" title from shotkit.com and "Ranked 2 out of 2" from Gear Patrol, which makes it a product worthy of consideration.

Moving on to the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III (2017): it was loved by reviewers at Expert Reviews and shotkit.com - two reliable sources that conduct objective in-depth testing. In fact, it was their "Best for long zoom shots" and "Ranked 3 out of 6", respectively, pointing towards it being a Mirrorless Camera worth considering.

To get a better idea of how they fare when compared directly to each other, we analyzed review scores of sources that tested both. Photography Blog, Techradar, TrustedReviews, Digital Photography Review, and PCmag, for example, preferred the Nikon Z 6 (2018), while Digital Camera World, Expert Reviews, and ePHOTOzine rated both of them the same.

We also took a look at which sources had the best things to say about them. We learned that the Nikon Z 6 (2018) got reviewed the highest by Digital Camera World - it gave it a rating of 10, while the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III (2017) most impressed reviewers at Digital Camera World, which gave it a score of 10.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Mirrorless Cameras on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Mirrorless Cameras being 7.9 out of 10, whereas the Nikon Z 6 (2018) and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III (2017) managed averages of 9.5 and 8.4 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Nikon Z 6 (2018) vs. Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III (2017) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.