Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Olympus Pen E-PL Cameras (2019) vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 Cameras (2015)
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II (2015)
iMore, a review site with a history of doing objective hands-on testing, has great things to say about the Olympus Pen E-PL10 (2019). In fact, it's "Ranked 2 out of 6" in its "Best Olympus cameras 2022" roundup, which points toward it being a good Mirrorless Camera.
As for the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II (2015) analysis - it impressed reviewers at globosurfer.com, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "10 Best Diving Cameras In 2023" roundup and earned the "Ranked 3 out of 10" title.
We analyzed all of the review data that we could find on these two Mirrorless Cameras. First, we examined sources that tested and scored both of these products - Photography Blog, Digital Camera World, Techradar, and Digital Photography Review favored the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II (2015) over the Olympus Pen E-PL10 (2019), whereas reviewers at ePHOTOzine haven't shown a preference for either.
Then we took a look at which sources liked them the most - we found that the Olympus Pen E-PL10 (2019) was best received by ePHOTOzine - it gave it a score of 10, whereas the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II (2015) got its highest score of 10 from reviewers at The Phoblographer.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Mirrorless Cameras on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Mirrorless Cameras being 7.9 out of 10, whereas the Olympus Pen E-PL10 (2019) and Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II (2015) managed averages of 8.3 and 8.9 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Olympus Pen E-PL10 (2019) vs. Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II (2015) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing