Fujifilm X-H Cameras (2018) vs Panasonic Lumix FZ__00 series Cameras (2016)

While the Fujifilm X-H1 (2018) wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Digital Camera World, PCmag, ePHOTOzine, Photography Blog, hardwarezone.com.sg, Techradar, TrustedReviews, Digital Photography Review, and camerajabber.com have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

As for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016), it was really well-received by reviewers at Digital Camera World, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The best camera for wildlife photography in 2023" roundup and was named its "Ranked 1 out of 9", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

For a direct Fujifilm X-H1 (2018) vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) comparison, we took a look at sources that tested both and found that the Fujifilm X-H1 (2018) got reviewed better by Digital Camera World, PCmag, and Digital Photography Review, whereas the reviewers at Photography Blog preferred the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016). Reviewers at Techradar and TrustedReviews haven't shown a preference for either.

We also took a look at which sources liked these two products the most. We found that the Fujifilm X-H1 (2018) received its best, 10, rating from Digital Camera World, while the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) got its highest score of 10 from Photography Blog.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Fujifilm X-H1 (2018) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 8.9 out of 10, compared to the 7.9 overall average of Mirrorless Cameras in general, whereas the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.9.