Olympus OM-D E-M10 Cameras (2015) vs Panasonic Lumix FZ__00 series Cameras (2016)

Macworld, a review site with a history of doing objective hands-on testing, has great things to say about the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (2015). In fact, it's "Ranked 3 out of 9" in its "Best camera 2016: Best DSLR and best CSC cameras UK" roundup, which points toward it being a good Mirrorless Camera.

As for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016), it was really well-received by reviewers at Digital Camera World, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The best camera for wildlife photography in 2023" roundup and was named its "Ranked 1 out of 9", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

Our direct Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (2015) vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Mirrorless Cameras, Digital Camera World, PCmag, and DXOMARK preferred the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (2015), whereas Photography Blog and Techradar seemed to like both equally.

We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (2015) got its highest, 10, review score from Photography Blog, while the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) most impressed reviewers at Photography Blog, which gave it a score of 10.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II (2015) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 8.8 out of 10, compared to the 7.9 overall average of Mirrorless Cameras in general, whereas the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.9.