Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Sony α9 Mirrorless Cameras (2017) vs Panasonic Lumix FZ__00 series Cameras (2016)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016)

The Sony α9 (2017) was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Can't Buy the New Camera You Want? Here's How to Find One You'll Love - Sony a1 Alternatives" roundup where it was named its "Ranked 1 out of 2", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) - it was really well-received by reviewers at Digital Camera World, a great source that's known for conducting high-quality in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The best camera for wildlife photography in 2023" roundup and was named its "Ranked 1 out of 9", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.
Our direct Sony α9 (2017) vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Mirrorless Cameras, Expert Reviews, Techradar, TrustedReviews, DXOMARK, Digital Camera World, and PCmag preferred the Sony α9 (2017), whereas Photography Blog seemed to like both equally.
We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Sony α9 (2017) got its highest, 10, review score from Photography Blog, while the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) most impressed reviewers at Photography Blog, which gave it a score of 10.
Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Sony α9 (2017) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 9.3 out of 10, compared to the 7.9 overall average of Mirrorless Cameras in general, whereas the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (2016) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.9.
- 1280 × 720 @ 25fps
- 1280 × 720 @ 30fps
- 1920 × 1080 @ 30fps
- 1920 × 1080 @ 60fps
- 1920 × 960 @ 120fps
- 1920 x 1080 @ 100fps
- 1920 x 1080 @ 24fps
- 1920 x 1080 @ 25fps
- 1920 x 1080 @ 50fps
- 3840 x 1920 @ 30fps
- 3840 x 2160 @ 24fps
- 3840 x 2160 @ 25fps
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing