PFU Happy Hacking Professional 3 Hybrid vs Logitech K480

The PFU Happy Hacking Professional 3 Hybrid is a great Wireless Keyboard for its $370 asking price.

The Logitech K480, however, while a reasonable product for $32, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Wireless Keyboards in the $30 range, you might want to check out some better options.

The PFU Happy Hacking Professional 3 Hybrid was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Wireless Keyboards for 2021" roundup where it was named its "Best for Extreme Key-Switch Connoisseurs, Programmers", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

Returning to the Logitech K480, TechGearLab, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Best for Versatility" in its "Best Wireless Keyboard of 2020" roundup, which is quite a feat.

We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like PCmag, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.

Then we checked which sources liked these two Wireless Keyboards best and found that the PFU Happy Hacking Professional 3 Hybrid got its highest, 8, review score from reviewers at PCmag, whereas the Logitech K480 earned its best score of 8 from PCmag.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Wireless Keyboards on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Wireless Keyboards being 7.1 out of 10, whereas the PFU Happy Hacking Professional 3 Hybrid and Logitech K480 managed averages of 8.0 and 8.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct PFU Happy Hacking Professional 3 Hybrid vs. Logitech K480 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.