Audio-Technica ATH-CKS5TW vs Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200

The Audio-Technica ATH-CKS5TW and the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 are decent Earphones at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $170 or $130.

If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the Audio-Technica ATH-CKS5TW and the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:

The Audio-Technica ATH-CKS5TW managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - Techradar and Wirecutter (NYTimes) - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.

As for the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at PCmag, SoundGuys, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Audio-Technica ATH-CKS5TW got its highest, 8, rating from Techradar, while the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 earned its best, 8, score from PCmag.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Audio-Technica ATH-CKS5TW and Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 managed averages of 8.0 and 7.9 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Audio-Technica ATH-CKS5TW vs. Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.