Bowers & Wilkins PI3 vs Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200

The Bowers & Wilkins PI3 makes for a good, if unremarkable Earphone for people with a $130 budget. The Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, however, is merely mediocre when compared to other options at its price point and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In both cases, however, you might want to look into some alternatives at the $130 price range - chances are that there are better options available.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Bowers & Wilkins PI3 and Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, however, we put together a summary of what we know:

While the Bowers & Wilkins PI3 wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. What Hi-Fi?, Tech Advisor, PCmag, Expert Reviews, Techradar, TrustedReviews, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

As for the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at PCmag, SoundGuys, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

Sources that tested and scored both products, like PCmag, haven't shown a preference for either in their reviews.

We also examined the available data to learn which sources liked these two Earphones best and found that the Bowers & Wilkins PI3 managed to get its highest, 10, review score from What Hi-Fi?, whereas the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 got its best rating from PCmag - 8.

Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Bowers & Wilkins PI3 earned an average review score of 8.6 out of 10 points and the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 received an average of 7.9, compared to the 7.3 average of Earphones in general.