JBL Reflect Mini 2 vs Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200

The JBL Reflect Mini 2 is a great Earphone for its $35 asking price.

The Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, however, is merely passable at its $119 price point. If you're considering buying a Earphone in the $130 range, you might want to check out some of its competitors.

Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the JBL Reflect Mini 2 to be a great product - it earned the "Best Bang for the Buck" title from TechGearLab and "Runner Up for Best Wireless Earbuds For Bass - Alternative For Sports" from Rtings in their respective Earphone roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.

As for the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at PCmag, SoundGuys, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like PCmag, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.

Then we checked which sources liked these two Earphones best and found that the JBL Reflect Mini 2 got its highest, 10, review score from reviewers at TechGearLab, whereas the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 earned its best score of 8 from PCmag.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the JBL Reflect Mini 2 and Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 managed averages of 8.2 and 7.9 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct JBL Reflect Mini 2 vs. Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.