JBL Under Armour Flash vs Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200

The JBL Under Armour Flash makes for a good, if unremarkable Earphone for people with a $150 budget. The Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, however, is merely mediocre when compared to other options at its price point and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In both cases, however, you might want to look into some alternatives at the $150 price range - chances are that there are better options available.

If you're still interested in learning more about the JBL Under Armour Flash and Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, however, we put together a summary of what we know:

The JBL Under Armour Flash was loved by reviewers at PCmag, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The Best Bluetooth Headphones for Running" roundup where it was named its "Good for MapMyRun Users", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at PCmag, SoundGuys, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

Sources that tested and scored both products, like PCmag, haven't shown a preference for either in their reviews.

We also examined the available data to learn which sources liked these two Earphones best and found that the JBL Under Armour Flash managed to get its highest, 8, review score from PhoneArena, whereas the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200 got its best rating from PCmag - 8.

Lastly, we averaged out all of their review data to compare them to their competitors. We found that the Plantronics Backbeat Fit 3200, with its 7.9 out of 10 points, got reviewed noticeably better than most of its competitors - the average Earphone score being 7.3 - whereas the JBL Under Armour Flash performed worse, with an average of merely 7.2.