Fitbit Charge 4 (2020) vs Polar Ignite

The Fitbit Charge 4 (2020) is an exemplary product and one of the very best Fitness Trackers at the $75 budget.

The Polar Ignite Pedometer, however, doesn't seem to have enough data available for us to be able to draw any meaningful conclusions. If you're considering Fitness Trackers in the $210 range, you might want to check out some other options.

The Fitbit Charge 4 (2020) was loved by reviewers at Tom's Guide, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best cheap fitness trackers in 2023" roundup where it was named its "Ranked 2 out of 9", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for our analysis of the Polar Ignite Pedometer - it's considered to be a great product by two reliable sources that do their own hands-on testing - it earned the "Ranked 2 out of 9" award from Good Housekeeping and "Ranked 3 out of 5" from iMore, which is no small feat.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Fitness Trackers, including Techradar, Tom's Guide, and Expert Reviews, preferred the Fitbit Charge 4 (2020) over the Polar Ignite Pedometer.

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Fitbit Charge 4 (2020) was liked best by TechGearLab, which gave it a score of 10, while the Polar Ignite Pedometer got its highest, 8, score from Techradar.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Fitness Trackers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Fitness Trackers being 7.5 out of 10, whereas the Fitbit Charge 4 (2020) and Polar Ignite Pedometer managed averages of 8.7 and 7.6 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Fitbit Charge 4 (2020) vs. Polar Ignite Pedometer comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.