Razer DeathAdder Essential Left-Handed Edition (2013) vs Roccat Kone Pure Ultra (2019)

While the Razer DeathAdder Essential Left-Handed Edition (2013) makes for a passable Gaming Mouse for its asking price, the Roccat Kone Pure Ultra (2019) simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by the majority of people. In either case, we suggest that you look into some better alternatives that cost around $140 or $65.

However, if you'd nonetheless like to find out more about the Razer DeathAdder Essential Left-Handed Edition (2013) and the Roccat Kone Pure Ultra (2019), you can continue reading for our summary of what we know about them:

The reviewers at CNET have featured the Razer DeathAdder Essential Left-Handed Edition (2013) in their Razer DeathAdder Left Hand Edition review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Roccat Kone Pure Ultra (2019), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at PCGamesN, Tom's Hardware, and Techradar enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Gaming Mice, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Razer DeathAdder Essential Left-Handed Edition (2013) got its highest, 7.5, rating from CNET, while the Roccat Kone Pure Ultra (2019) earned its best, 8, score from PCGamesN.

Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The Roccat Kone Pure Ultra (2019) managed to get 8.0 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.5 review average of Gaming Mice in general - whereas the Razer DeathAdder Essential Left-Handed Edition (2013) earned 7.5 points.

It should be said that doing a direct Razer DeathAdder Essential Left-Handed Edition (2013) vs. Roccat Kone Pure Ultra (2019) comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.