Razer Basilisk (2017) vs Razer Naga Hex v2 (2016)

The Razer Basilisk (2017) has managed to impress reviewers from two reliable and objective sources that conduct their own testing, namely realgear.net and reviewgeek.com. It did great in their roundups - it earned the "Ranked 1 out of 7" title from realgear.net, and "Ranked 2 out of 6" from reviewgeek.com, which marks it as a product that's worth considering.

As for the Razer Naga Hex v2 (2016) - PCmag, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Razer Naga Hex V2 Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.

We also performed a thorough Razer Basilisk (2017) vs. Razer Naga Hex v2 (2016) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both Gaming Mice, including PCmag, preferred the Razer Basilisk (2017) over the Razer Naga Hex v2 (2016).

Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the Razer Basilisk (2017) turned out to be most loved by TechSpot, which gave it a score of 9.5, whereas the Razer Naga Hex v2 (2016) got its highest, 7, rating from reviewers at PCmag.

Finally, we compared their average scores to all other Gaming Mice on the market. We found that the Razer Basilisk (2017) got reviewed considerably better than most of its competitors - it earned an average of 8.6, compared to the 7.5 out of 10 overall rating of other Gaming Mice - while the Razer Naga Hex v2 (2016) performed worse than most of its competition, with an average score of 6.5.