Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless (2019) vs Razer Naga Pro
The Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless (2019) has done great in quite a few roundups from some of the most highly trusted sources available, such as Laptop Mag, PCmag, and TechGearLab, which perform high-quality in-depth testing. It got awarded the "The best gaming mouse for wireless ambidextrous gamers" title by Laptop Mag, "Ranked 2 out of 11" by PCmag, and "Ranked 2 out of 12" by TechGearLab in their respective roundups. Earning that much praise from such respected sources is undoubtedly an impressive accomplishment.
Taking a look at the Razer Naga Pro, we found that it did great in numerous roundups from highly trusted sources that conduct objective in-depth testing, including Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, and Rtings - it was named "Best Wireless Mouse for MMOs" by Tom's Hardware, "The best MMO wireless gaming mouse" by Tom's Guide, and "Ranked 1 out of 4" by Rtings. A product that's held in such high regard by some of the most reliable sources on the internet should be considered by anyone that's in the market for a Gaming Mouse at this price.
For a direct Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless (2019) vs. Razer Naga Pro comparison, we took a look at sources that tested both and found that the Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless (2019) got reviewed better by PCmag, whereas the reviewers at Rtings and Tom's Hardware preferred the Razer Naga Pro. Reviewers at Windows Central, Tom's Guide, and Laptop Mag haven't shown a preference for either.
We also took a look at which sources liked these two products the most. We found that the Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless (2019) received its best, 10, rating from reviews.org, while the Razer Naga Pro got its highest score of 9.4 from techaeris.com.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless (2019) earned an average review score of 8.7 out of 10 points and the Razer Naga Pro received an average of 8.7, compared to the 7.5 average of Gaming Mice in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing