Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Black & Decker Max Lithium Dustbuster Hand Vacuum (CHV) vs Roborock S5 Max
Black & Decker Max Lithium Dustbuster Hand Vacuum (CHV1410L)

The Black & Decker Max Lithium Dustbuster Hand Vacuum (CHV1410L) has done great in quite a few roundups from some of the most highly trusted sources available, such as CNET, Rtings, Consumer Reports, and Wirecutter, which perform high-quality in-depth testing. It got awarded the "Best value cordless car vacuum" title by CNET, "Best Budget Handheld Vacuum" by Rtings, and "Ranked 1 out of 7" by Consumer Reports in their respective roundups. Earning that much praise from such respected sources is undoubtedly an impressive accomplishment.
Moving on to the Roborock S5 Max: it was loved by reviewers at iMore and Android Central - two reliable sources that conduct objective in-depth testing. In fact, it was their "Ranked 1 out of 6" and "Ranked 1 out of 6", respectively, pointing towards it being a Handheld Vacuum Cleaner worth considering.
As for a direct Black & Decker Max Lithium Dustbuster Hand Vacuum (CHV1410L) vs. Roborock S5 Max comparison of their review performance, we examined sources that tested and rated both products, like Modern Castle. It turns out that all such sources consider the Roborock S5 Max to be the superior product.
We also looked at the available data to find which sources liked each of them best and learned that the Black & Decker Max Lithium Dustbuster Hand Vacuum (CHV1410L) most impressed reviewers at Modern Castle - they gave it a score of 9.1, whereas the Roborock S5 Max got rated best by TrustedReviews - 10.
Lastly, we averaged out all of their review data to compare them to their competitors. We found that the Roborock S5 Max, with its 9.1 out of 10 points, got reviewed noticeably better than most of its competitors - the average Handheld Vacuum Cleaner score being 8.0 - whereas the Black & Decker Max Lithium Dustbuster Hand Vacuum (CHV1410L) performed worse, with an average of merely 7.7.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing