Roccat Kain 20x Aimo (2019) vs Asus ROG Spatha (2016)

While the Asus ROG Spatha (2016) is a passable option for its $149 asking price, you might want to look into other options at its price point - chances are, there are better choices out there.

As for the Roccat Kain 202 Aimo (2019), we unfortunately couldn't find enough data on the product to come to any meaningful conclusions. You can find our recommendations for Gaming Mice that cost around $85 here.

If you're nevertheless interested in learning more about the Asus ROG Spatha (2016), however, you can read on for a summary on what we know about it:

The reviewers at kitguru.net have featured the Asus ROG Spatha (2016) in their Asus ROG Spatha Wireless Gaming Mouse Review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Roccat Kain 202 Aimo (2019) analysis - it impressed reviewers at Techradar, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best wireless gaming mouse 2021" roundup and earned the "Best stripped down wireless gaming mouse" title.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Gaming Mice, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Asus ROG Spatha (2016) got its highest, 9, rating from kitguru.net, while the Roccat Kain 202 Aimo (2019) earned its best, 8, score from Windows Central.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Gaming Mice on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Gaming Mice being 7.5 out of 10, whereas the Asus ROG Spatha (2016) and Roccat Kain 202 Aimo (2019) managed averages of 9.0 and 8.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Asus ROG Spatha (2016) vs. Roccat Kain 202 Aimo (2019) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.