Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Samsung Galaxy Fit (2019) vs Fitbit Zip 2012
The Samsung Galaxy Fit (2019) was well-received by reviewers at Android Central, a trustworthy source that performs unbiased hands-on testing. It did great in their "Best Samsung fitness tracker 2022" roundup - they named it their "Ranked 2 out of 3", which, by itself, suggests that it's a noteworthy product.
Moving on to the Fitbit Zip 2012: it was loved by reviewers at reviewgeek.com and iMore - two reliable sources that conduct objective in-depth testing. In fact, it was their "Best For Kids Who Don’t Like Wristbands" and "Ranked 1 out of 2", respectively, pointing towards it being a Pedometer worth considering.
To get a better idea of how they fare when compared directly to each other, we analyzed review scores of sources that tested both. CNET, for example, preferred the Samsung Galaxy Fit (2019), while TechGearLab and Techradar rated both of them the same.
We also took a look at which sources had the best things to say about them. We learned that the Samsung Galaxy Fit (2019) got reviewed the highest by Expert Reviews - it gave it a rating of 10, while the Fitbit Zip 2012 most impressed reviewers at OutdoorGearLab, which gave it a score of 9.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Pedometers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Pedometers being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Samsung Galaxy Fit (2019) and Fitbit Zip 2012 managed averages of 7.6 and 8.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Samsung Galaxy Fit (2019) vs. Fitbit Zip 2012 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing