Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
ASUS ZenFone 6 (2019) vs Samsung Galaxy S8 (2017)
While the ASUS ZenFone 6 (2019) wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Digital Camera World, techadvisor.com, Android Central, The Verge, TrustedReviews, PhoneArena, hardwarezone.com.sg, and kitguru.net have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.
As for the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active (2017) analysis - it impressed reviewers at Android Central, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best Cricket Wireless Phones as of March 2018" roundup and earned the "Ranked 1 out of 3" title.
We analyzed all of the review data that we could find on these two Smartphones. First, we examined sources that tested and scored both of these products - TrustedReviews, PhoneArena, hardwarezone.com.sg, and The Verge favored the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active (2017) over the ASUS ZenFone 6 (2019), whereas reviewers at techadvisor.com and Digitaltrends haven't shown a preference for either.
Then we took a look at which sources liked them the most - we found that the ASUS ZenFone 6 (2019) was best received by Digital Camera World - it gave it a score of 9, whereas the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active (2017) got its highest score of 10 from reviewers at TrustedReviews.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Smartphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Smartphones being 7.5 out of 10, whereas the ASUS ZenFone 6 (2019) and Samsung Galaxy S8 Active (2017) managed averages of 8.0 and 8.9 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct ASUS ZenFone 6 (2019) vs. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active (2017) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.