Jabra Sport Pulse (2014) vs Samsung Gear IconX (2016)

The Samsung Gear IconX (2016) and the Jabra Sport Pulse (2014) are decent Earphones at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $130 or $85.

If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the Samsung Gear IconX (2016) and the Jabra Sport Pulse (2014), however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:

The reviewers at Android Authority have featured the Samsung Gear IconX (2016) in their Best heart rate monitor earbuds roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Moving on to the Jabra Sport Pulse (2014): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like SoundGuys, Tech Advisor, Expert Reviews, CNET, Tom's Guide, PCmag, Android Authority, Reviewed, and Gear Patrol, enough for them to include them on those lists.

We meant to do a direct Samsung Gear IconX (2016) vs. Jabra Sport Pulse (2014) comparison of their review ratings, but couldn't because we weren't able to find any review scores for the Samsung Gear IconX (2016).

Lastly, we examined how the Jabra Sport Pulse (2014) stacks up against other Earphones on the market by comparing their average review ratings. We found that it managed to earn an average review score of 7.2 out of 10 points, which is comparable to the overall, 7.3, average of Earphones in general.