Jaybird X3 (2016) vs Samsung Gear IconX (2016)

The Jaybird X3 (2016) makes for a good, if unremarkable, Canal Earphone for people with a $35 budget.

The Samsung Gear IconX (2016), however, is merely mediocre at its $77 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $35 and $75 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Jaybird X3 (2016) and Samsung Gear IconX (2016), however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:

The Jaybird X3 (2016) was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best Headphones For Back To School 2017" roundup where it was named its "Best Sweat Resistance", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for the Samsung Gear IconX (2016) - Android Authority, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Best heart rate monitor earbuds roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.

Lastly, we tried to do a direct Jaybird X3 (2016) vs. Samsung Gear IconX (2016) comparison of review ratings between these two products, but couldn't find any review scores for the Samsung Gear IconX (2016).

Compared to all other Canal Earphones on the market, however, the Jaybird X3 (2016) performed great. When averaged out, it earned a rating of 8.0 out of 10, which is much better than the 7.4 review average of Canal Earphones in general.