Samsung Gear IconX (2016) vs Plantronics BackBeat FIT (2014)

While the Samsung Gear IconX (2016) makes for a passable Earphone for its asking price, the Plantronics BackBeat FIT (2014) simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by the majority of people. In either case, we suggest that you look into some better alternatives that cost around $130 or $85.

However, if you'd nonetheless like to find out more about the Samsung Gear IconX (2016) and the Plantronics BackBeat FIT (2014), you can continue reading for our summary of what we know about them:

The reviewers at Android Authority have featured the Samsung Gear IconX (2016) in their Best heart rate monitor earbuds roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Plantronics BackBeat FIT (2014) - it impressed reviewers at Android Authority, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "Best Workout Earbuds of 2017" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Best Waterproof" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.

We meant to do a direct Samsung Gear IconX (2016) vs. Plantronics BackBeat FIT (2014) comparison of their review ratings, but couldn't because we weren't able to find any review scores for the Samsung Gear IconX (2016).

Lastly, we examined how the Plantronics BackBeat FIT (2014) stacks up against other Earphones on the market by comparing their average review ratings. We found that it managed to earn an average review score of 7.3 out of 10 points, which is comparable to the overall, 7.3, average of Earphones in general.