Skullcandy Indy vs Samsung Gear IconX (2016)

The Samsung Gear IconX (2016) and the Skullcandy Indy are decent Earphones at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $130 or $30.

If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the Samsung Gear IconX (2016) and the Skullcandy Indy, however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:

The reviewers at Android Authority have featured the Samsung Gear IconX (2016) in their Best heart rate monitor earbuds roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Skullcandy Indy - it was really well-received by reviewers at TechGearLab, a great source that's known for conducting high-quality in-depth testing. It performed great in its "Best Waterproof Earbuds of 2020" roundup and was named its "Best Fit for All-Day Comfort", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

We meant to do a direct Samsung Gear IconX (2016) vs. Skullcandy Indy comparison of their review ratings, but couldn't because we weren't able to find any review scores for the Samsung Gear IconX (2016).

Lastly, we examined how the Skullcandy Indy stacks up against other Earphones on the market by comparing their average review ratings. We found that it managed to earn an average review score of 7.0 out of 10 points, which is comparable to the overall, 7.3, average of Earphones in general.