Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Hisense A6G Series TVs vs Samsung N5300
The Hisense A6G 85" has done great in various roundups conducted by reliable and unbiased sources that do their own testing, like creativebloq.com, Popular Mechanics, and MakeUseOf - it earned the "The best TV for PS5 for under $400/£400" title from creativebloq.com, "Best Second Room TV" from Popular Mechanics, and "Ranked 1 out of 7" from MakeUseOf.
As for the Samsung N5300 32", it was really well-received by reviewers at Rtings, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The 3 Best 32-Inch TVs - Winter 2023" roundup and was named its "Best 32-Inch Kitchen TV", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both TVs, including Rtings, preferred the Hisense A6G 85" over the Samsung N5300 32".
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Hisense A6G 85" was liked best by Expert Reviews, which gave it a score of 8, while the Samsung N5300 32" got its highest, 5.7, score from Rtings.
Lastly, we compared their average review performance to that of the rest of their competition and found that neither option got received particularly well. With an average rating of 7.1 out of 10, the Hisense A6G 85" performed similarly to most other TVs on the market - the overall average review score for this product category being 7.7 - while the Samsung N5300 32" did worse than most, with its average of 5.7 points.
There's one caveat here - a direct Hisense A6G 85" vs. Samsung N5300 32" comparison might not be entirely justifiable due to the difference in their pricing and the fact that some sources tend to give lower ratings to cheaper products because they don't take value for money into account.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing