Sennheiser Ambeo 3D Soundbar (2018) vs Polk Audio Signa S2 Soundbar (2018)

The Sennheiser Ambeo 3D Soundbar (2018) is one of the very best Soundbars that one can get for around $2,000. The Polk Audio Signa S2 Soundbar (2018) (AM6214-A), however, while a very good choice at its $270 price point, falls just short of being remarkable.

The Sennheiser Ambeo 3D Soundbar (2018) was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best soundbars of 2021" roundup where it was named its "Best All-Around", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for the Polk Audio Signa S2 Soundbar (2018) (AM6214-A) - it impressed reviewers at Reviewed, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "The Best Soundbars Under $200 of 2021" roundup - in fact, it earned its "Ranked 2 out of 7" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Soundbars, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Sennheiser Ambeo 3D Soundbar (2018) got its highest, 10, rating from HomeTheaterReview.com, while the Polk Audio Signa S2 Soundbar (2018) (AM6214-A) earned its best, 10, score from Head-fi.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Soundbars on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Soundbars being 7.6 out of 10, whereas the Sennheiser Ambeo 3D Soundbar (2018) and Polk Audio Signa S2 Soundbar (2018) (AM6214-A) managed averages of 8.9 and 9.5 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Sennheiser Ambeo 3D Soundbar (2018) vs. Polk Audio Signa S2 Soundbar (2018) (AM6214-A) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.