Sennheiser CX Sport vs AfterShokz Trekz (2015)

While the Sennheiser CX Sport makes for a passable Earphone for its asking price, the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) simply doesn't make the cut and should be avoided by most people. In both cases, however, you might want to look at some better alternatives at the $85 budget range.

If you nevertheless want to learn more about the Sennheiser CX Sport and the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015), however, we wrote a short summary of what we know about them:

While the Sennheiser CX Sport wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. Techradar, What Hi-Fi?, PCmag, Reviewed, and Wirecutter (NYTimes) have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

As for the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) analysis - it impressed reviewers at Android Central, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best Bone Conduction Headphones in 2021" roundup and earned the "Best Value" title.

Our direct Sennheiser CX Sport vs. AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Earphones, Techradar preferred the Sennheiser CX Sport, whereas Digitaltrends seemed to like both equally.

We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Sennheiser CX Sport got its highest, 9.1, review score from Gadget Review, while the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) most impressed reviewers at Runnerclick, which gave it a score of 8.8.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Sennheiser CX Sport did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 7.7 out of 10, compared to the 7.3 overall average of Earphones in general, whereas the AfterShokz Trekz Titanium AS600 (2015) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.2.