Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Urbanista Seattle vs Sennheiser Momentum On-Ear (2013)
Sennheiser Momentum On-Ear (2013)
We couldn't find enough data on either product to be able to come to any reliable conclusions. We highly recommend that you take a look at some other options instead.
What Hi-Fi?, a source known for its hands-on testing and objective methodology, had good things to say about the Urbanista Seattle. It performed great in its "Best on-ear headphones 2021" roundup and earned the "Excellent value wireless headphones that sound great for the price." title.
Moving on to the Sennheiser Momentum On-Ear (2013): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like Expert Reviews, CNET, PCmag, What Hi-Fi?, Head-fi, and TrustedReviews, enough for them to include them on those lists.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Wireless Headphones, including What Hi-Fi? and TrustedReviews, preferred the Urbanista Seattle over the Sennheiser Momentum On-Ear (2013).
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Urbanista Seattle was liked best by What Hi-Fi?, which gave it a score of 10, while the Sennheiser Momentum On-Ear (2013) got its highest, 10, score from Expert Reviews.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Wireless Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Wireless Headphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Urbanista Seattle and Sennheiser Momentum On-Ear (2013) managed averages of 8.7 and 8.3 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Urbanista Seattle vs. Sennheiser Momentum On-Ear (2013) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.