Shure SE112 (2014) vs CCA C10

While the CCA C10 makes for a fairly good In-Ear Monitor for people with a $40 budget, we haven't been able to find enough data on the Shure SE112 (2014) to come to any reliable conclusions.

In both cases, however, you might want to look into some other options before settling on one of these.

If you nevertheless want to learn more about the CCA C10 and Shure SE112 (2014), however, here's what we know about them:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C10 in their CCA C10 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

As for the Shure SE112 (2014), it was really well-received by reviewers at Consumer Reports, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "Best Headphones for Under $50" roundup and was named its "Best Cheap Wired Earbuds", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

We also performed a thorough CCA C10 vs. Shure SE112 (2014) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both In-Ear Monitors, including Head-fi, preferred the CCA C10 over the Shure SE112 (2014).

Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the CCA C10 turned out to be most loved by Head-fi, which gave it a score of 9.1, whereas the Shure SE112 (2014) got its highest, 9, rating from reviewers at AVForums.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the CCA C10 did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 9.1 out of 10, compared to the 7.7 overall average of In-Ear Monitors in general, whereas the Shure SE112 (2014) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.6.